For instance, you know when you’re in a complicated relationship with your Special friend or group of friends/mates or in your family or even within society and you need to apply reverse or direct psychology to get/explain what you want. Could be Money, Power, Respect which you desperately desire to chase your destiny and dreams. in plain English one can make ‘X’ a constant unknown be (survival) a subject and make the ‘Y’ another constant unknown be (instinct) the predicate of the subject to forge ‘Z your survival instinct’ to form of gate way to archiving your dreams through public notice!
Using (uncensored wears) For Example.
Macmillan Maths and English Application Maxims in Streets Wear Fashion
“Denial was so beautiful and sexy when as a bonus she decided to open early for your breath to pass through her trap thighs of misconceived logic”
Didn’t mean to burst your bubble but you know there is always that instances in real life when you have to solve a problem or escape a situatuation then you unknowing applied logical incentives in order to succeed. that was what we did when when we were practically stuck in our ethical dilemma while solving for truth in uncensored wears.
we applied logic (simple math algebra and or English dilemma)
Remember to fix a problem with unknown variables you need to use substitution to solve For Example: x + y = z; Then i remembered you need to make x, y or z a subject to enable you to solve that Problem.
Or in plain English one can make ‘X’ be (uncensored) the subject and make the ‘Y’ be (wears) the predicate to forge ‘Z’ to be (uncensored wears) a name or a phrase, clause or an incomplete sentence.
“who said this:- the middle aged mamas boys living in his mamma’s basement”- true story
Logical Philosophical implications of The Categorical Imperative;
By Application of the English Dilemma and Mathematical principle of elimination by substitution adopted in the previous instance into the universe of all things we found and applied “X an unknown” (wear a predicate) as a substitute and solved for “Y an unknown” (an uncensored idea) to be the Subject and vice versa while solving for a categorical Imperative of “Z an unknown” name or a phrase, clause or an incomplete sentence.
WE PLAYED THESE SIMULATIONS OVER AND OVER TILL WE HAD ALL REASONABLE THOUGHT WITHOUT A DOUBT THAT THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE FOR REASONING AND RESOLVING THE TRUTH ABOUT UNCENSORED WEARS WAS TO DISCOVER THAT IN THE END WE HAD BRIDGED AN IMPORTANT REVOLUTIONARY GAP OF OPPOSITE REASONING UNITED AS ONE.
THINK OF ANY CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE THAT IS OPPOSITE BUT CAN BE UNITED AS ONE.
OPPOSITE REASONS SUCH AS AGREEING TO DISAGREE, DISAGREEING TO DISAGREE, AGREE TO AGREE OR DISAGREEING TO DISAGREE, MOVING AHEAD OR MOVING FORWARD OR LIVING IN THE PAST AND LOOKING TOWARDS THE FUTURE. There are many countless other opposites reasoning which can unite as one UNCENSORED WEARS BEING ONE OF THEM.